This page lists top-level overview articles on Risk Management and on Audit and Governance. You can start drilling down from each of these overviews.
| As a retired director of internal audit, I aim to keep active with occasional audits, or with broader support for the audit function. I can offer the most value for audits bridging IT and business, and for novel audit topics. I’m available for professional and supporting roles in Canberra at modest hourly rates, as needed, with no expectation of regular income. Roger Lines Employment résumé |
| Risk Management | ||
| For Everyone | For Specialists | For the Australian Government |
|
Risk in work unit business planning Risk management in projects: the real reason. Posted for re-publication in PM Magazine June 2019. |
Risk in work unit business planning Centralised or de-centralised risk management in your enterprise? Integrating de-centralised risk management for enterprise risk management Consequences as outcome differences (with risk appetite and tolerance), on LinkedIn. Repeatable risk events don’t have a ‘likelihood’ Deep exploration of event likelihoods, frequencies, counts and totals |
What is Risk Management? Australian Government supplement |
| Audit and Governance | ||
| For Everyone | For Specialists | For the Australian Government |
|
In governance, do only what matters |
Audit recommendation tracking Internal auditing assures an audit committee (and everything else is an optional extra) Audit recommendations are secondary; so are ‘findings’ |
|
The Clear Lines have an origin in Australian Government work. The Clear Lines pay attention to the Australian perspective, and to the public-sector perspective. But the Clear Lines are definitely not about ‘how we do things here’. They are about achieving purpose.
Original solutions are validated against the professional standards covering the activity. The main standards bodies cited are ISO, IIA and ISACA, and the central authorities for the Australian Government.
Please comment freely. There are many original Lines that should be challenged. All the Clear Lines meet formal standards before you see them, but I would love to hear that some of them are not Clear enough, or should be followed only with caution. Articles in Beta versions are specifically intended for experts to critique. There is a reply box at the bottom of each post and page. You can also use the email contact facility.
Roger Lines
PMIIA CIA CRMA CISA CRISC
Canberra, Australia
Comments are moderated from a sea of spam, so may not be published immediately. Email contact may get a quicker response.